Who decided this was problem hair and why? We do need to ask around to understand. I feel most of it is shame based, imitating others we perceive as more successful or better than ourselves.
When people braid their hair, have extensions or sport their natural hair, it should be a choice not a compulsion to satisfy other peoples’ norms, win their affection or acceptance. Messages are being sent clearly to the children who do not listen to what we say all the time but they are always watching what we do.
Many Africans whose ancestors immigrated from abroad and have blonde, black, red or black straight hair and fair complexions probably don’t feel the wound of discrimination flicked in this hair debate. I suppose they may feel indignant that they can’t express themselves by having hairstyles of their choice at school. The legacy of straight hair and afro hair have the same roots, but the experiences are vastly differently. One is an issue of following the school rules about short back and sides or off your face, while the other still implies you’re not good enough – conform or take the consequence.
To expand thinking I turn to the colonisation of our continent. Jan van Riebeek, in 1652, is depicted with luscious locks. All photos of him show him proud, his trusses sprawling down either side of his pushed out chest. Is it not possible that among the other right and wrong, in and out identities which were then successfully imposed on the majority of people having hair like an African slave brought and spread shame?
Hair in the community I grew up in is still a big deal. I never did understand it because my genetic big, dark-circled eyes were my concern, never my hair. Friends and people admired and complimented my waist length hair. Eventually I did understand. When I was 12 a Dutch school friend asked me: ”Are you white or coloured?“. ”Urm … If it matters, we can’t be friends,” was my reply. “No, no, no, it’s just that coloured people have crinkly, short hair.”
I must confess relief that that was her assumption and at least I could hold onto my identity as a confident coloured girl, in a predominantly white environment AND my hair passed. With hindsight and awareness, I fully realise the irony in that feeling that I thought I was confident and yet I was relieved there was one less hoop for me to clear.
When people made a big deal about hair, I could shrug my shoulders and roll my eyes. However, as I got older I saw what an impact it had on us when our friends had boyfriends with curly hair and their relatives and friends would joke about any future children’s hair. Some of my friends’ hated being out in the mist and rain because their hair would “mince”. I have a friend who bought a hair straightening contraption so that her hair doesn’t “go home” (another way to say “mince”). Both mean to avoid your straight hair frizzing, curling or crimping out of style when exposed to moisture.
Growing up on the Capeflats, names like “kroeskop”, “chara hare” and “afkop” were used to insult people. “Boere” was used for the fair of complexion friends with straight or blonde hair. “Kroeskop” used to degrade people with tight scalp hugging hair; “chara hare” was used to refer to someone who looked Indian and had sleek shiny black hair, that was a racist insult and backhanded combo, it is messed up! “Afkop” implied tight hair and stupid. We were socialised like this and for this – that straight hair was preferred and treated like a choice – my own community must take responsibility. It never was and is still not ac choice.
The insights I draw from having straight hair is that when I was young, while I could see what was happening, I didn’t relate to it and it never really impacted me, so I was “safe”. I liken my childlike position then to many South Africans today who can make a difference with their voices and their understanding about pre- and post-apartheid but don’t because they are “safe”. Some even judge and criticise when ordinary citizens speak up or protest about privilege, corruption, domestic violence, the high cost of tertiary education, racism, service delivery, evictions from areas where 99 year leases were sealed with a handshake and the cutting down of trees in a forest by way of examples.
I am at liberty to say that we all have a tipping point, something that makes us get up, put a stake in the ground and say enough! It is my firm belief that we don’t put ourselves in other people’s shoes and struggles enough. We stick with our opinions and judgements never stretching ourselves to be over there and see if there is real dissatisfaction, if something is bigger and deeper than it seems.
We have to dig deep to find our humanity, to practise empathy and understanding and definitely to reserve our right to judge without enough enquiry. If we, as a country, can make a concerted effort to understand why hair is a currency, we will fight the good fights and win the battle to transformation. If these hair protests spread, it is my wish principals and school governing bodies alike will seek to understand rather than be understood. There are lessons to be learnt and taught, let us not lose this lesson. Let us get curious about “kroes”!
Lisa Joshua Sonn is a social activist. Follow her on Twitter: @annalisasonn
from Hairstylez http://cityhairstyle.xyz/opinion-hair-is-a-currency-eyewitness-news/
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar